The myth of genius and the sociology of privilege

Taking a step back from the dizzying headlines, Elon Musk has fallen for the oldest, biggest planet-killing myth of them all – the myth of his own genius. 

Not content to regard founding PayPal as an act of genius rather than a stochastic effect of privilege, Musk believed his own brand of magic powder touched everything he did. 

The fact that the dice were loaded heavily in his favour seems to have escaped him. Self-awareness isn’t usually a skill valued by people like Musk. 

He now seems on the verge of destroying a communication platform, Twitter, that, for all its faults, had become a vital part of our public discourse.  

Ironically, Jack Dorsey originally founded Twitter as a journaling tool, not a site for endless gladiatorial arguments over Brexit. Unlike Musk, Dorsey never tried to impose his ego on Twitter. He allowed it to take its course, shaped by the anarchic, self-organising forces that used it. 

Want to read the full article?

Create an account and view in our online library.

Related Articles

What’s the difference between a scandal and a crisis? 

These two words often get mixed up. This conflation is a big problem, as the effective methods of dealing with a scandal and a crisis vary significantly. Get it wrong, and the future of the company is at stake. Most businesses have some crisis management contingency, as this field has been studied to a far greater level. But very few have any actual preparations in place for a scandal. 

A crisis is like rough surf. People with the right skills know what to do. A scandal is a riptide. Far deadlier.


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.